Strategy tool

Which capability gap is actually worth closing first?

List the few things a business must get right to win in your industry, rate how critical each is, and where you stand against where you need to be. The tool ranks your gaps by criticality, not raw size, because a small gap on a critical factor beats a large gap on one that barely matters.

List your critical success factors: the handful of things a business must get right to win in your market, not a generic list of virtues. Mark how critical each is, then rate your capability now and the level you need. The ranking is criticality × gap, so a small gap on a critical factor can outrank a large gap on a standard one. Gaps of zero don't rank.

New to this? What each column means and how to score

You're ranking the few things your business has to get right to win, by how big a gap you have against how much each one matters. Every capability is scored 1 (weak) to 5 (excellent). Plain English below.

  1. List your critical success factors: the handful of things a business genuinely has to get right to win in your industry. Rename the examples or add your own with + Add factor.
  2. Set how critical each one is: Critical, Important or Standard.
  3. Rate your capability Now and the level you Target, each 1 to 5. The gap between them is the fixable distance.
  4. Read the ranking. It's criticality times gap, so a small gap on a critical factor can outrank a large gap on one that barely matters. Gaps of zero don't rank.
Critical success factor
One of the few things a business simply has to get right to win in your specific industry, rather than a generic list of virtues. Name the ones that actually decide who wins in your market.
Criticality
How much winning in your market depends on this factor. Critical = you can't win without it. Important = it matters a lot. Standard = useful, but not decisive.
Now (capability)
How good you honestly are at this today. 1 = weak or unreliable. 5 = excellent.
Target (capability)
The level you actually need to reach, on the same 1 to 5 scale. It doesn't have to be 5; aim at what winning requires.
Gap
Target minus Now: the distance you'd need to close. 0 = already where you need to be, so it won't rank.
Priority
Criticality times gap. A small gap on a critical factor can beat a large gap on a standard one, which is the whole point of ranking this way.
Critical success factor Criticality Now Target Gap Priority

Close this first

Win new customers efficiently

The highest criticality-weighted gap. Not always your biggest raw gap.

Your gaps, ranked by what your industry rewards

The reorder

Sorted by criticality times gap, the order differs from raw gap size. That difference is the whole point.

Rank it on evidence →

Your current-capability scores read naturally from the Business Health Check; a Commercial Assessment adds the outside read a self-score can't, and the APG Platform turns the top-ranked gaps into owned, valued initiatives.

A ranking is only as good as the factors behind it. The hard part is upstream of the arithmetic: naming the factors that genuinely decide who wins in your market, and judging their criticality honestly. A list built for the industry you wish you were in will point you confidently in the wrong direction. Current capability is a self-rating, and self-ratings flatter, so treat a confident score on a critical factor as the place to seek an outside view. Weights mirror APG's (critical 1.5, important 1.0, standard 0.5). Not financial advice.

The thing you're worst at is frequently not the thing to fix first.

Ranking capability gaps by what your market rewards, rather than by raw size, is what keeps improvement pointed at winning. A Commercial Assessment builds it from evidence.

Start with a Commercial Assessment →

Not ready to talk? Find your constraint in 60 seconds →